WWF UK Blog  

Tanneries, the Ganges and how WWF is driving change

 

The Ganges, a sacred river to Hindus and home to a rich diversity of fish, turtles, aquatic mammals and iconic species such as the Ganges river dolphin and the Gharial (a fish eating crocodile), is being choked by pollution and sediment.

This week the BBC broadcast a compelling news piece looking at the mighty river, focusing on the impact that people are having on it.

If you haven’t seen it is definitely worth having a read.

Pollution is not the only thing affecting the river; dams for hydropower, and the abstraction of significant volumes of water from the river to irrigate crops also affect it. But pollution from domestic and industrial sources is severe, and in many stretches is having a significant impact.

The volumes are hard to visualise, with the equivalent of 120-130 Olympic sized swimming pools of largely untreated domestic and industrial wastewater being returned to the river every day. The unnerving consequence is very poor water quality in areas downstream of cities and industrial areas.

Ganges DophinGanges Dophin © Francois Xavier Pelletier / WWF Canon

How are tanneries impacting on the Ganges?

One of the industries that is particularly polluting and is the leather sector and this is one of the focus areas of the BBC piece, with the news crew visiting a tannery in Kanpur. The video clip of the visit, available to view on the BBC website, makes for shocking viewing.

Employing more than 100,000 people in over 400 tanneries, the leather cluster in the city of Kanpur is one of the largest in India, and one of the most significant polluters within the Ganges river basin.

Outflow from the Jajmau sewage and effluent treatment plant in KanpurOutflow from the Jajmau sewage and effluent treatment plant in Kanpur © WWF

Currently it is estimated that about two thirds of the wastewater that is produced by the tanneries is returned to the river without being treated. This impacts on communities and nature, for example:

  • By contributing to a significant decline in the number of fish in Ganges since the 1950s, observed most significantly at Kanpur. This impacts on local communities who have had to change their diet, as the carp that used to make up the bulk of their diet have been impacted more greatly than other types of fish.
  • Leading to concentrations of chromium (almost entirely due to the tanneries) of up to 100 times the level prescribed by the World Health Organisation for drinking water.

There are also risks to the tannery businesses themselves, and the livelihoods of those that depend on them. Local authorities have ordered the tanneries to stop operating because of the pollution. For example in January 2013 400 tanneries in Kanpur were forced to close for 45 days during a religious festival on banks of Ganges river. In February 2015 the district administration stopped the power supply to 98 tanneries. These tanneries were allowed to reopen in May 2015 but only on the on condition that they upgrade their treatment technologies.

What action is WWF taking to help protect the river and its people and species?

So what is the solution? WWF is currently working on a programme of work funded by HSBC which is looking to bring life back to a number of rivers globally, of which the Ganges is one. There is by no means a simple answer, but we are committed to finding integrated solutions that enable even the smaller tanneries to continue to operate, whilst reducing the impact on nature and local communities.

River GangesRiver Ganges © WWF

A key part of the process has been identifying options for improving the practices of small and medium sized tanneries. A number of appropriate cleaner technology options have been identified and are now being tested. The aim is to demonstrate that these technologies not only deliver environmental and social benefits, but that they save money too.

Although a great start, these pilots will only go a small way to reducing the impact of the sector of the Ganges. We are therefore looking at how to scale up action including:

  • Bringing together key stakeholders in the basin to share the business case for clear technology and drive wider uptake;
  • Exploring whether green finance can be used to fund cleaner technologies in those units that cannot afford it themselves and provide additional incentives for other units;
  • Analysing the policies that set how the water in the Ganges River Basin is being managed, identifying how they need to change and advocating for these changes to be made and implemented;
  • Exploring how the international buyers of leather (90% of leather produced in Kanpur is exported) can use the influence of their supply chain to support action.

These changes aren’t easy, and we won’t be able to implement them overnight. But engaging key stakeholders both in India and internationally, and taking action collectively to develop solutions that deliver for business as well as people and nature, we have a real opportunity to deliver change at the scale necessary to reduce impact and to ensure that this is sustainable into the future. We are optimistic that working together we can drive the scale of change that is needed.

Related posts


Comments


  • Albert Pinto

    Thanks for pointing out that Indian regulators are tightening the screw on water effluent treatment by the Kanpur tanneries. The tanneries will bleat about the increased water treatment costs so it is important to highlight the supply-demand economics of leather. A large part of the the leather made in Kanpur tanneries is finished by high-end shoemakers in Italy. Processing hides and converting them into smooth supple leather, requires many acidic and caustic chemicals that bleach and soften hairy animal skin. It is therefore important to remember that offshoring the environmentally destructive parts of the leather process is a policy that suits leather exporters in India AND the European haute coture industry. Corrupting Indian regulators would be a lot harder if global demand for leather products went down.

    • Lucy Lee

      Hi Albert,
      Many thanks for your comments.

      On your point on offshoring – we think it is really important that there is transparency along the supply chain, so that consumers can be aware of the impact of the products they are buying, not just at the stage of final manufacturing. With increasing awareness of the impact of tanneries, for example as a result of being featured in the recent BBC programme, there is a greater reputational risk for companies.

      In terms of increased cost, we think that the tanneries in Kanpur can make substantial improvement without large investments or by making investments that have short payback periods through energy and raw material savings. We have been working on a similar project in Pakistan looking to support the improvement of water management
      practices by tanneries. Through this we have evidence of the payback periods from better practices. Typically businesses that implemented recommended cleaner technologies and process improvements saw payback periods of around six months, with a one off capital investment resulting in, on average, savings of double the initial investment annually.

      Ultimately there is a need for collective action by key stakeholder to manage the reduction in shared water risks that are impacting on communities, ecosystems and nature and to support the improved governance of water to support sustainable and equitable water management.
      Lucy